The code can be generated using AI.
Input: "The author of the monograph titled “Cicero’s ailing emotions: A Stoic’s paradoxical pain as the exegete AI translates” denounces the machine‟s ability to „think‟ in his lectures spanning the last five years. Dr. Sheppard, a renowned scholar on philosophy and machine understanding, presents his doubts as to the inevitable approach of the singularity—a veritable second coming—by citing Moore‟s law for transistors. While whether the scholar‟s erudite argument sustains the test of time is for futurity to tell, there is little question as to his refined ability to impart knowledge and deliver on foundational research."
Processor: LLM Base Model
Output: Directed Acyclic Graph (graphviz etc.)
First Pass
LLM Model on LLM Model:
"Scenario ANOTHER: the model focused strictly on "Moore's Law" If your right-most node says something like "The singularity is not inevitable due to transistor limits," the model prioritized the dense technical argument over the author's praise of the professor. Smaller models often latch onto concrete scientific terms (like Moore's Law) and make them the final conclusion because they look like a traditional logic puzzle."
Second Pass
Third Pass
Fourth Pass
Fifth Pass
Appended "Analyse the passage for its rhetoric."
Rhetoric -- First Pass
Rhetoric -- Second Pass
Why does the author use 'exegete' -- First Pass
Other questions on the same text:
